滥用职权行为与受贿行为并存时应如何定性处罚/顾园园
作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-07-10 19:53:44 浏览:8891
来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载
一、案情简介
季某,系某市中级人民法院执行法官。2006年8月,东辰集团通过建设银行分行贷款3000万元给华皖集团。贷款到期后,华皖集团无资金偿还借款,经中级法院民事调解书确认,华皖集团欠东辰集团贷款本金3000万元及利息226.8万元,华皖集团在调解生效后3日内给付东辰集团,珠绒公司承担连带清偿责任。季某为东辰集团申请执行珠绒公司和华皖集团借款合同纠纷案件的执行承办法官。
在该案的执行过程中,季某多次接受华皖集团代理人周某的吃请及现金4000元并以购房的名义向其索要“借款”10万元。之后季某积极配合周某和东辰集团的要求,加快了案件执行速度,不但在查封房产时,未到现场实地查看被查封房产的实际状况,而且在明知周某和东辰集团违反相关评估和拍卖程序,违规操作的情况下予以默许,将案件移送中院综合科继续执行,致使珠绒公司13处具有升值潜力的房产流拍从而直接抵付给东辰集团,造成华皖集团、珠绒公司损失1100万余元。
二、分歧意见
第一种意见认为,季某的行为仅构成受贿罪,且受贿数额仅为4000元。理由是:(1)申请执行人东辰集团和被执行人华皖集团协商决定评估机构是双方的权利,且案件进入拍卖程序后即已转入中院执行局综合科,与季某的意志无关。此外,加快案件的执行速度只是为了积极履行执行法官的职权,季某客观上并不能为周某谋取执行方面的便利,因此季某的行为不构成滥用职权罪。(2)客观上难以认定季某向周某所借的10万借款具有受贿性质。关于该案中10万元款项属于借款还是受贿,应当根据《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》的7项标准来对照分析。季某借款有明确的事由,有归还的能力,周某并未要求季某利用职务上的便利为其谋取利益。综上,应当以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任,且受贿数额仅为4000元。
第二种意见认为,季某的行为同时构成滥用职权罪和受贿罪,且受贿数额为104000元,应当两罪并罚。理由是:(1)季某身为法院执行局的工作人员,在办理该借款合同纠纷案件期间,违反规定处理公务,造成珠绒公司经济损失1100余万元,符合滥用职权罪的构成要件。(2)在执行过程中,非法收受周某财物并为其谋取诸如违反拍卖的程序加快案件执行速度等执行案件方面的便利,故构成受贿罪。两罪同时成立时,应当在总和刑期以下,两刑中最高刑以上,根据案情决定执行的刑期。
第三种意见认为,季某的行为同时构成执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪和受贿罪,且受贿数额为104000元,应当按照受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。理由是:(1)季某身为人民法院的司法工作人员,在执行该贷款合同纠纷案件中,在明知周某安排东辰集团与华皖集团、珠绒公司共同选择评估机构、拍卖机构,违规运以便作通过低价评估、拍卖等程序将标的物流拍的情况下,而滥用职权,将案件移交进入评估、拍卖程序,并且违反规定送达优先购买权人于拍卖日到场的通知书,客观上为周武忠违规运作创造条件,符合执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪。(2)季某以买房借款为名收受周某10万元,既没有书写借款凭据亦未约定还款时间,且周某在供述中也明确表示,该10万元是送的,而非借的。因此季某的受贿数额为104000元。(3)在将10万元认定为受贿数额的情形下,应当适用刑法第三百九十九条第四款的规定择一重罪处罚,即应以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。
三、评析意见
其一,本案以执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪定罪更为恰当。滥用职权罪的主体构成要素为国家机关工作人员,执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪的主体构成要素特定为司法工作人员,另季某在执行裁定的时候,严重不负责任,不履行法定执行职责,在明知评估程序系违规运作的情形下而将案件交送拍卖程序,这种放任的不作为使得华皖集团与珠绒公司遭受了巨额财产损失。即本案中季某的身份与犯罪行为同时符合滥用职权罪和执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪两个罪名,按照法理,一个行为同时符合同一法律的普通条款与特别条款规定的犯罪构成时,应当适用特别法条优于普通法条的原则,这也是由两者的关系决定的。普通条款是在一般范围内普遍适用的刑法,而特别条款是在特定范围内适用的刑法,就本案而言,特别条款的效力及于具有特定身份的人,只有这样,特别条款才会发挥其应有的意义。
其二,季某的受贿数额为104000元。该案中,季某主观借款动机无法证明,其既没有书写借款凭据亦未约定还款时间,知道后来得知周某被纪委调查,怕此事暴露才将此款还给周某,季某所借款项确实是为购买房屋所用也只能证明季某收受该10万元的用途,而不能达到该10万元系借款的目的。而该案的行贿人周某也在供述中也明确表示,该10万元是送的,而非借的,行贿人的供述与其他证据形成完整证据链的情形下,应当认定该笔款项的贿赂性质。2007年下半年,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院专门出台了司法解释,对10种市场经济条件下的新类型受贿刑事案件法律适用问题提供具体意见,其中就包括借款形式的受贿情形。综上,按照证据链的证明以及司法解释的相关规定,均应认定季某所借10万元款项为受贿款项。
其三,在以上分析成立的前提下,应当以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。我国刑法明确规定了收受贿赂又犯执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪的,依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚。在刑法理论上,这是典型的处罚的一罪,对于该种犯罪,应按行为所触犯的罪名中的一个重罪论处,而不以数罪论处。在行为所触犯的两个罪名的法定刑相同的情况下,不是按所谓目的行为定罪量刑,而是按照事实情节较重的犯罪论处,本案中刑法第三百九十九条第四款的规定即是对这一处理原则的肯定。
作者单位:安徽省蚌埠市龙子湖区人民检察院
季某,系某市中级人民法院执行法官。2006年8月,东辰集团通过建设银行分行贷款3000万元给华皖集团。贷款到期后,华皖集团无资金偿还借款,经中级法院民事调解书确认,华皖集团欠东辰集团贷款本金3000万元及利息226.8万元,华皖集团在调解生效后3日内给付东辰集团,珠绒公司承担连带清偿责任。季某为东辰集团申请执行珠绒公司和华皖集团借款合同纠纷案件的执行承办法官。
在该案的执行过程中,季某多次接受华皖集团代理人周某的吃请及现金4000元并以购房的名义向其索要“借款”10万元。之后季某积极配合周某和东辰集团的要求,加快了案件执行速度,不但在查封房产时,未到现场实地查看被查封房产的实际状况,而且在明知周某和东辰集团违反相关评估和拍卖程序,违规操作的情况下予以默许,将案件移送中院综合科继续执行,致使珠绒公司13处具有升值潜力的房产流拍从而直接抵付给东辰集团,造成华皖集团、珠绒公司损失1100万余元。
二、分歧意见
第一种意见认为,季某的行为仅构成受贿罪,且受贿数额仅为4000元。理由是:(1)申请执行人东辰集团和被执行人华皖集团协商决定评估机构是双方的权利,且案件进入拍卖程序后即已转入中院执行局综合科,与季某的意志无关。此外,加快案件的执行速度只是为了积极履行执行法官的职权,季某客观上并不能为周某谋取执行方面的便利,因此季某的行为不构成滥用职权罪。(2)客观上难以认定季某向周某所借的10万借款具有受贿性质。关于该案中10万元款项属于借款还是受贿,应当根据《全国法院审理经济犯罪案件工作座谈会纪要》的7项标准来对照分析。季某借款有明确的事由,有归还的能力,周某并未要求季某利用职务上的便利为其谋取利益。综上,应当以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任,且受贿数额仅为4000元。
第二种意见认为,季某的行为同时构成滥用职权罪和受贿罪,且受贿数额为104000元,应当两罪并罚。理由是:(1)季某身为法院执行局的工作人员,在办理该借款合同纠纷案件期间,违反规定处理公务,造成珠绒公司经济损失1100余万元,符合滥用职权罪的构成要件。(2)在执行过程中,非法收受周某财物并为其谋取诸如违反拍卖的程序加快案件执行速度等执行案件方面的便利,故构成受贿罪。两罪同时成立时,应当在总和刑期以下,两刑中最高刑以上,根据案情决定执行的刑期。
第三种意见认为,季某的行为同时构成执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪和受贿罪,且受贿数额为104000元,应当按照受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。理由是:(1)季某身为人民法院的司法工作人员,在执行该贷款合同纠纷案件中,在明知周某安排东辰集团与华皖集团、珠绒公司共同选择评估机构、拍卖机构,违规运以便作通过低价评估、拍卖等程序将标的物流拍的情况下,而滥用职权,将案件移交进入评估、拍卖程序,并且违反规定送达优先购买权人于拍卖日到场的通知书,客观上为周武忠违规运作创造条件,符合执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪。(2)季某以买房借款为名收受周某10万元,既没有书写借款凭据亦未约定还款时间,且周某在供述中也明确表示,该10万元是送的,而非借的。因此季某的受贿数额为104000元。(3)在将10万元认定为受贿数额的情形下,应当适用刑法第三百九十九条第四款的规定择一重罪处罚,即应以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。
三、评析意见
其一,本案以执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪定罪更为恰当。滥用职权罪的主体构成要素为国家机关工作人员,执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪的主体构成要素特定为司法工作人员,另季某在执行裁定的时候,严重不负责任,不履行法定执行职责,在明知评估程序系违规运作的情形下而将案件交送拍卖程序,这种放任的不作为使得华皖集团与珠绒公司遭受了巨额财产损失。即本案中季某的身份与犯罪行为同时符合滥用职权罪和执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪两个罪名,按照法理,一个行为同时符合同一法律的普通条款与特别条款规定的犯罪构成时,应当适用特别法条优于普通法条的原则,这也是由两者的关系决定的。普通条款是在一般范围内普遍适用的刑法,而特别条款是在特定范围内适用的刑法,就本案而言,特别条款的效力及于具有特定身份的人,只有这样,特别条款才会发挥其应有的意义。
其二,季某的受贿数额为104000元。该案中,季某主观借款动机无法证明,其既没有书写借款凭据亦未约定还款时间,知道后来得知周某被纪委调查,怕此事暴露才将此款还给周某,季某所借款项确实是为购买房屋所用也只能证明季某收受该10万元的用途,而不能达到该10万元系借款的目的。而该案的行贿人周某也在供述中也明确表示,该10万元是送的,而非借的,行贿人的供述与其他证据形成完整证据链的情形下,应当认定该笔款项的贿赂性质。2007年下半年,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院专门出台了司法解释,对10种市场经济条件下的新类型受贿刑事案件法律适用问题提供具体意见,其中就包括借款形式的受贿情形。综上,按照证据链的证明以及司法解释的相关规定,均应认定季某所借10万元款项为受贿款项。
其三,在以上分析成立的前提下,应当以受贿罪追究季某的刑事责任。我国刑法明确规定了收受贿赂又犯执行判决、裁定滥用职权罪的,依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚。在刑法理论上,这是典型的处罚的一罪,对于该种犯罪,应按行为所触犯的罪名中的一个重罪论处,而不以数罪论处。在行为所触犯的两个罪名的法定刑相同的情况下,不是按所谓目的行为定罪量刑,而是按照事实情节较重的犯罪论处,本案中刑法第三百九十九条第四款的规定即是对这一处理原则的肯定。
作者单位:安徽省蚌埠市龙子湖区人民检察院
下载地址: 点击此处下载
北京市基本医疗保险费用结算暂行办法
北京市基本医疗保险费用结算暂行办法
北京市劳动和社会保障局 北京市财政局 北京市卫生局 北京市中医管理局
京劳社医发(2001)17号
第一条 为加强对基本医疗保险基金支出的管理，保证职工和退休人员的基本医疗，根据《北京市基本医疗保险规定》（2001年2月20日北京市人民政府第68号令），制定本办法。
第二条 参加本市基本医疗保险的职工和退休人员（以下简称参保人员）、定点医疗机构、定点零售药店、社会保险事务经办机构之间的基本医疗保险费用结算适用本办法。
第三条 市劳动和社会保障局主管全市基本医疗保险费用结算管理工作；区、县劳动和社会保障局负责本辖区内基本医疗保险费用结算管理工作。
市医疗保险事务经办机构负责本市基本医疗保险审核结算工作的业务指导和监督检查；区、县医疗保险事务经办机构负责本辖区内参保人员基本医疗保险费用的审核、结算。市和区、县社会保险基金管理机构负责参保人员基本医疗保险费用的支付。
第四条 参保人员符合本市基本医疗保险定点医疗管理规定，以及基本医疗保险药品目录、诊疗项目目录、医疗服务设施范围和支付标准的医疗费用，按本办法以及其他有关规定进行结算。
第五条 基本医疗保险费用结算包括以下范围：
（一）由基本医疗保险个人账户支付的门诊、急诊医疗费用；到定点零售药店购药的费用；基本医疗保险统筹基金起付标准以下的医疗费用；超过基本医疗保险统筹基金起付标准，按比例应由个人支付的医疗费用。
（二）由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的住院治疗的医疗费用；急诊抢救留观并收入住院治疗的，其住院前留观7日内的医疗费用；恶性肿瘤放射治疗和化学治疗、肾透析、肾移植后服抗排异药的门诊医疗费用。
（三）职工因公外出、探亲期间在外埠县级以上（含县级）、易地安置的退休人员在当地乡级以上（含乡级）的基本医疗保险定点机构就医，符合基本医疗保险规定的医疗费用。
第六条 基本医疗保险费用按以下方式结算：
（一）参保人员门诊、急诊和住院医疗费用以服务项目结算为主要方式结算；
（二）部分病种的医疗费用按医疗机构的不同等级实行按病种结算；
（三）门诊肾透析、肾移植后服抗排异药的医疗费用实行定额结算。
第七条 参保人员到本人的定点医疗机构门诊、急诊或者到定点零售药店购药，按规定应由基本医疗保险个人账户支付的医疗费用，参保人员凭《北京市民卡》与定点医疗机构或者定点零售药店直接结算，由市和区、县社会保险基金管理机构拨付给定点医疗机构或者定点零售药店。
不属于基本医疗保险个人账户支付范围的医疗费用或者个人账户资金不足支付时，由参保人员现金结算。
第八条 参保人员在定点医疗机构住院的医疗费用中由个人支付的部分，与定点医疗机构直接结算。
参保人员在办理住院手续时，按照基本医疗保险规定应由个人支付的比例，先交纳一定数额的预交金，由定点医疗机构开具预交收据，出院时进行结算。
第九条 参保人员在定点医疗机构住院的医疗费用以及恶性肿瘤放射治疗和化学治疗、肾透析和肾移植后服抗排异药的门诊医疗费用，应由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的部分，由医疗保险事务经办机构与定点医疗机构结算。
第十条 由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的医疗费用，在基本医疗保险制度实施初期，市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构根据基本医疗保险基金收缴情况及不同类别、等级医院的工作量，可以给予定点医疗机构一定数额的预付金。
第十一条 参保人员住院治疗不超过90天，每次住院为一个结算期，按实际住院天数结算医疗费用；超过90天的，以90天为一个结算期，90天以后为另一个结算期。
参保人员患精神病住院治疗不超过180天，每次住院为一个结算期，按实际住院天数结算医疗费用；超过180天的，以180天为一个结算期，180天以后为另一个结算期。
第十二条 参保人员患恶性肿瘤门诊放射治疗和化学治疗的医疗费用每90天为一个结算期，90天以后为另一个结算期。
参保人员门诊肾透析、肾移植后服抗排异药的医疗费用，每180天为一个结算期，180天以后为另一个结算期。
第十三条 参保人员跨年度连续住院的医疗费用，医疗保险事务经办机构与定点医疗机构对其当年12月31日以前（含31日）发生的住院医疗费用和自下一年1月1日起发生的住院医疗费用分别进行清结。
参保人员跨年度连续住院的医疗费用，每90天为一个结算期。
第十四条 参保人员在定点医疗机构住院的医疗费用，应由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的，由定点医疗机构填写《北京市医疗保险住院费用审核结算凭证》每月1日至20日内向参保人员参保的市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构申请审核、结算。
第十五条 参保人员经市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构批准进行恶性肿瘤放射治疗和化学治疗、肾透析、肾移植后服抗排异药的门诊医疗费用，应由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的，由指定的定点医疗机构填写《北京市医疗保险门、急诊（药店）费用审核结算凭证》，并持《北京市医疗保险特殊病种申报审批单》每月1日至20日内向参保人员参保的市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构申请审核、结算。
第十六条 参保人员急诊抢救留观并收入住院治疗的，其住院前留观7日内，参保人员已现金支付的医疗费用应由基本医疗保险统筹基金支付的，由参保人员单位汇总，持缴费证明、参保人员定点医疗机构收入院证明，急诊处方底方及医疗费收据等有关资料，于参保人员出院后的次月1日至20日内到参保的市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构申请审核、结算。
第十七条 参保人员在外埠的定点医疗机构就医发生的医疗费用，先由个人垫付，按规定应由本市基本医疗保险个人账户和统筹基金支付的医疗费用，由用人单位按月汇总，持外埠定点医疗机构的诊断证明、处方底方、费用清单和医疗费收据，填写《北京市医疗保险外埠就医费用申报明细表》，每月1日至20日内向参保的市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构申请审核、结算。
第十八条 市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构收到定点医疗机构或者用人单位医疗费用结算申请及有关材料后，在15个工作日内进行审核。对符合规定的医疗费用通知市和区、县社会保险基金管理机构予以支付。遇特殊情况需进一步调查的，可暂缓支付，但最长不得超过30个工作日。
用人单位收到社会保险基金管理机构支付的医疗费用后，应按支付数额及时发给参保人员。
第十九条 市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构应加强对长期住院参保人员的管理，参保人员连续住院时间满6个月的，由定点医疗机构填写《北京市医疗保险住院超6个月登记审批表》，报市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构备案。
第二十条 市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构应加强对定点医疗机构门诊处方、急诊抢救留观、入出院标准、特殊检查治疗、住院病历的审核和管理。
第二十一条 区、县医疗保险事务经办机构应按月填报《北京市医疗保险门诊费用汇总表》、《北京市医疗保险特殊病种门诊费用汇总表》、《北京市医疗保险住院费用汇总表》，报市医疗保险事务经办机构，由市医疗保险经办机构进行汇总。
第二十二条 基本医疗保险费用结算应严格执行本市基本医疗保险管理的有关规定，对骗取基本医疗保险金，造成基本医疗保险基金损失的、有违法所得的，根据《北京市基本医疗保险规定》，由市和区、县医疗保险事务经办机构责令其退还、赔偿；市和区、县劳动和社会保障局进行处罚。
第二十三条 本办法由市劳动和社会保障局负责解释。
第二十四条 本办法自2001年4月1日起施行。
2001年2月28日
SECURITIES (INSIDER DEALING) ORDINANCE ——附加英文版
SECURITIES (INSIDER DEALING) ORDINANCE
(CHAPTER 395)
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
ion
I PRELIMINARY
hort title
nterpretation
pplication
Connected with a corporation"
ossession of relevant information obtained in privileged
capacity
Dealing in securities"
Take-over offer"
Relevant information"
II INSIDER DEALING
hen insider dealing takes place
Certain persons not to be held insider dealers
Trustees and personal representatives
Exercise of right to subscribe for or acquire securities
Duty of officers of corporation
Insider dealing not void or voidable
III INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL
Constitution of Tribunal Inquiries by Tribunal
Inquiries into insider dealing
Powers of Tribunal
Further powers of Tribunal to obtain information
Incriminating answers
Offences
Privileged information Report and orders of Tribunal
Report of Tribunal following inquiry
Orders etc. of Tribunal
Order against officer of corporation
Limitation on aggregate amount of penalties
Witnesses' expenses
Expenses of investigation and inquiry
Form and proof of order of Tribunal
Order of Tribunal may be registered in Court
Offence
IV APPEALS
Appeal to Court of Appeal
Powers of the Court of Appeal on appeal
Stay of execution on appeal
V MISCELLANEOUS
Offences by corporation, etc.
Limitation on commencement of proceedings
Chief Justice may make rules
44. (Omitted)
Whole document:
dule.
rdinance to amend the law relating to insider dealing in
securities;
for connected purposes.
eptember 1991] L. N. 269 of 1991
PART I PRELIMINARY
hort title
Ordinance may be cited as the Securities (Insider Dealing)
Ordinance.
nterpretation
In this Ordinance, unless the context otherwise requires--
ociate", in relation to a person entitled to exercise or control
the
cise of voting power in relation to a corporation, means--
that person's spouse, reputed spouse, person co-habiting
with that
on as a spouse, that person's brother, sister, parent,
step-parent,
d (natural or adopted) or step-child;
any corporation of which that person is a director;
any person who is an employee or partner of that person;
if that person is a corporation--
any director of that corporation;
any related corporation of that corporation; and
) any director or employee of any such related corporation; and
if that person has with any other person an agreement or
arrangement
respect to the acquisition, holding or disposal of shares or
other
rests in that corporation or under which they undertake
to act
ther in exercising their voting power in relation to it, that
other
on;
k or other document" includes--
books of a banker;
cheques, orders for the payment of money, bills of
exchange, and
issory notes in the possession or under the control of a banker;
securities in the possession or under the control of a banker,
whether
ay of pledge or otherwise;
any document or record used in the ordinary course of business
of a
;
any record so used which is kept otherwise than in a legible form
and
apable of being reproduced in a legible form; and
any accounts or deeds;
mission" means the Securities and Futures Commission
established by
Securities and Futures Commission Ordinance (Cap. 24);
pany" means a company as defined in section 2 (1) of the
Companies
nance (Cap. 32);
troller", in relation to a corporation, means any person--
in accordance with whose directions or instructions the
directors of
corporation or of another corporation of which it is a subsidiary
are
stomed to act; or
who, either alone or with any associate, is entitled to exercise,
or
rol the exercise of, more than 33% of the voting power at
general
ings of the corporation or of another corporation of which it
is a
idiary, and references in this Ordinance to "control"
shall be
trued accordingly; "corporation" means any company or
other body
orate or an unincorporated body, incorporated or formed either
in Hong
or elsewhere;
ector" includes--
any person occupying the position of director, by
whatever name
ed; and
any person in accordance with whose directions or
instructions the
ctors of the corporation are accustomed to act;
ument" includes any register, book, record, tape recording, any
form
omputer input or output, and any other document or similar
material
ther produced mechanically, electrically, or manually, or by any
other
s whatsoever);
h Court" means the High Court of Justice;
ding company" means a corporation which is a holding company
within
meaning of section 2 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32);
uiry" means an inquiry instituted under section 16;
ider dealer" means a person who perpetrates any act which
is an
der dealing within the meaning of section 9 and also means a
person
is to be regarded as an insider dealer under section 16 (6);
ider dealing" means an insider dealing within the meaning of
section
ted securities" means securities that are listed on the
Unified
ange at the time of any insider dealing in relation
to those
rities;
icer" in relation to a corporation includes a director,
manager or
etary, and in relation to an unincorporated body includes every
member
he governing body thereof; "related corporation", in relation
to a
oration, means--
any corporation that is that corporation's subsidiary or
holding
any or a subsidiary of that corporation's holding company;
any corporation a controller of which is also a controller of
that
oration; "relevant share capital" means a corporation's issued
share
tal of a class carrying rights to vote at general meetings
of the
oration;
urities" means any shares, stocks, debentures, loan stocks,
funds,
s, or notes of, or issued by, any body, whether
incorporated or
corporated, or of any government or local government authority,
and
udes--
rights, options, or interests (whether described as
units or
rwise) in or in respect of any of the foregoing;
certificates of interest or participation in, or temporary or
interim
ificates for, receipts for, or warrants to subscribe to or
purchase,
of the foregoing; or
any instruments commonly known as securities;
sidiary" means any corporation which is a subsidiary
within the
ing of section 2 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32);
bunal" has the meaning given to it in section 15;
fied Exchange" means the stock market established under section
27 of
Stock Exchanges Unification Ordinance (Cap. 361).
For the purpose of the definition of "controller", where a
person is
tled to exercise or control the exercise of 33% or more of the
voting
r at general meetings of a corporation and that
corporation is
tled to exercise or control the exercise of any of the voting power
at
ral meetings of another corporation ("the effective voting
power")
the effective voting power at general meetings of
that other
oration is taken as exercisable by that person.
A person shall not be deemed to be a person in accordance with
whose
ctions or instructions the directors of a corporation are
accustomed
ct by reason only that the directors of the corporation act on
advice
n by him in a professional capacity.
In this Ordinance securities are deemed to be listed on the
Unified
ange notwithstanding that dealings in such securities
have been
ended.
In this Ordinance a reference to an interest in securities is
to be
as including an interest of any kind whatsoever in the
securities;
accordingly there are to be disregarded any restraints or
restrictions
hich the exercise of any right attached to the interest
may be
ect.
pplication
Ordinance shall not have effect with respect to an insider dealing
in
tion to the listed securities of a corporation which has taken
place
re the commencement of this Ordinance.
Connected with a corporation"
A person is connected with a corporation for the purposes of
section 9
being an individual--
he is a director or employee of that corporation or a
related
oration; or
he is a substantial shareholder in the corporation or a
related
oration; or
he occupies a position which may reasonably be expected to give
him
ss to relevant information concerning the corporation by virtue
of--
any professional or business relationship existing between
himself (or
employer or a corporation of which he is a director or a firm of
which
s a partner) and that corporation, a related corporation or an
officer
ubstantial shareholder in either of such corporations; or
his being a director, employee or partner of a
substantial
eholder in the corporation or a related corporation; or
he has access to relevant information in relation to the
corporation
irtue of his being connected (within the meaning of paragraph (a),
(b)
c)) with another corporation, being information which relates
to any
saction (actual or contemplated) involving both those
corporations or
lving one of them and the listed securities of the other or to
the
that such transaction is no longer contemplated; or
he was at any time within the 6 months preceding any
dealing in
tion to listed securities within the meaning of section 9 a
person
ected with the corporation within the meaning of paragraph (a),
(b),
or (d).
A corporation is a person connected with a corporation
for the
oses of section 9 so long as any of its directors or employees
is a
on connected with that other corporation within the
meaning of
ection (1).
In subsection (1), "substantial shareholder" in
relation to a
oration means a person who has an interest in the relevant
share
tal of that corporation which has a nominal value equal to or
more
10% of the nominal value of the relevant share capital of
that
oration.
ossession of relevant information obtained in privileged
capacity
A public officer or a member or employee (whether such
member or
oyee is temporary or permanent, paid or unpaid) of any body
referred
n subsection (2), who in his capacity as such receives
relevant
rmation concerning a corporation shall be deemed to be a
person
ected with that corporation for the purposes of section 9.
The bodies referred to in subsection (1) are--
the Executive Council;
the Legislative Council;
the Futures Exchange Company, Stock Exchange Company or any
clearing
e;
any board, commission, committee or other body appointed by
or on
lf of the Governor or the Governor in Council under any Ordinance;
any body corporate established or incorporated by Ordinance; and
any body corporate specified by the Financial Secretary by
notice
ished in the Gazette.
In this section--
aring house" means a clearing house within the meaning of section
2
of the Commodities Trading Ordinance (Cap. 250) or authorized
under
other Ordinance to carry on business as a clearing house in
respect of
rities;
ures Exchange Company" means the Exchange Company within the
meaning
ection 2 (1) of the Commodities Trading Ordinance (Cap. 250);
ck Exchange Company" means the Exchange Company within the
meaning of
ion 2 (1) of the Stock Exchanges Unification Ordinance (Cap. 361).
In the case of a body referred to in subsection (2) which
has no
ers the reference in subsection (1) to a member shall be construed
as
ference to a member of the governing body thereof.
Dealing in securities"
the purposes of this Ordinance, a person deals in securities if
ther as principal or agent) he buys, sells, exchanges or
subscribes
or agrees to buy, sell, exchange or subscribe for, any securities
or
ires or disposes of, or agrees to acquire or dispose of, the right
to
sell, exchange or subscribe for, any securities.
Take-over offer"
his Ordinance, "take-over offer for a corporation" means an offer
made
ll the holders (or all the holders other than the person making
the
r and his nominees) of the shares in the corporation to acquire
those
es or a specified proportion of them, or to all the holders (or
all
holders other than the person making the offer and his nominees)
of a
icular class of those shares to acquire the shares of that class
or a
ified proportion of them.
Relevant information"
his Ordinance "relevant information" in relation to a
corporation
s specific information about that corporation which is not
generally
n to those persons who are accustomed or would be likely to deal
in
listed securities of that corporation but which would if
it were
rally known to them be likely materially to affect the price of
those
rities.
PART II INSIDER DEALING
hen insider dealing takes place
Insider dealing in relation to the listed securities of a
corporation
s place--
when a person connected with a corporation who is in
possession of
rmation which he knows is relevant information in relation to
that
oration deals in any listed securities of that corporation (or
in the
ed securities of a related corporation) or counsels or
procures
her person to deal in such listed securities knowing or
having
onable cause to believe that such person would deal in them;
when a person who is contemplating or has contemplated making
(whether
or without another person) a take-over offer for a corporation
and
knows that the information that the offer is contemplated or
is no
er contemplated is relevant information in relation
to that
oration, deals in the listed securities of that corporation (or
in the
ed securities of a related corporation) or counsels or
procures
her person to deal in those listed securities, otherwise than for
the
ose of such take-over;
when relevant information in relation to a corporation is
disclosed
ctly or indirectly, by a person connected with that
corporation, to
her person and the first-mentioned person knows that the
information
elevant information in relation to the corporation and knows
or has
onable cause for believing that the other person will make use
of the
rmation for the purpose of dealing, or counselling or
procuring
her to deal, in the listed securities of that corporation (or in
the
ed securities of a related corporation);
when a person who is contemplating or has contemplated making
(whether
or without another person) a take-over offer for a corporation
and
knows that the information that the offer is contemplated or
is no
er contemplated is relevant information in relation
to that
oration, discloses that information, directly or
indirectly, to
her person and the first-mentioned person knows or has
reasonable
e for believing that the other person will make use of the
information
the purpose in dealing, or in counselling or procuring
another to
, in the listed securities of that corporation (or in the
listed
rities of a related corporation);
when a person who has information which he knows is
relevant
rmation in relation to a corporation which he received
(directly or
rectly) from a person--
whom he knows is connected with that corporation; and
whom he knows or has reasonable cause to believe
held that
rmation by virtue of being so connected,
s in the listed securities of that corporation (or in the
listed
rities of a related corporation) or counsels or procures
another
on to deal in those listed securities;
when a person who has received (directly or indirectly) from a
person
he knows or has reasonable cause to believe is contemplating or
is no
er contemplating a take-over offer for a corporation,
information to
effect and knows that such information is relevant
information in
tion to that corporation, deals in the listed securities
of that
oration (or in the listed securities of a related
corporation) or
sels or procures another person to deal in those listed
securities.
An insider dealing in relation to the listed
securities of a
oration also takes place when a person who is knowingly in
possession
elevant information in relation to that corporation in any
of the
umstances described in subsection (1) --
counsels or procures any other person to deal in the listed
securities
hat corporation (or in the listed securities of a related
corporation)
he knowledge or with reasonable cause to believe that, that
person
d deal in those listed securities outside Hong Kong on any
stock
ange other than the Unified Exchange; or
discloses that relevant information to any other person
in the
ledge or with reasonable cause to believe that, that or some
other
on will make use of that information for the purpose of dealing,
or of
selling or procuring any other person to deal, in
the listed
rities of that corporation (or in the listed securities of a
related
oration) outside Hong Kong on any stock exchange other
than the
ied Exchange.
不分页显示 总共3页 1 [2] [3]
下一页
